I would suggest a third option: Ethernet over power line WiFi extenders: ![]() Repeaters are, to varying degrees, slower and less reliable than access points, but are easier to install. There is much less than can go wrong with an access point than a repeater and fewer potential points of failure. The same cannot be said for additional access points as they are hardwired into the router via Etherent. If any repeaters upstream are subject to WiFi interference or saturation of the repeater's bandwidth, a downstream repeater's signal will suffer. It is a less efficient solution all around.Ī repeater further down the chain depends on upstream repeaters having good signal at all times. Repeaters also have less bandwidth than additional access points. Latency increases slightly every time the signal bounces off another repeater as it has to be received and then rebroadcast, which adds a few milliseconds at each repeater in the chain. ![]() They are used to extend the range of a WiFi network where it is difficult to install additional access points with their own dedicated Ethernet connection back to the modem or switch. Avoid using repeaters if you are able to install access points. Their benefit comes in the increased ease of installation. There are zero signal-quality advantages to repeaters over additional access points.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |